Volume 2,Issue 11
Fall 2024
初中生攻击行为的现状分析及对策
目的：全面考察初中生攻击行为的现状特征及其影响因素，并基于实证研究结果提出针对性干预对策。方法：采用Buss-Perry攻击量表（BPAQ）对某地区2所中学的597名初中生进行问卷调查，结合描述性统计、t检验等方法进行数据分析。结果：初中生攻击行为总分为2.56±0.61分，处于中等水平，其中身体攻击得分最高（2.75±0.70分），敌意得分最低（2.19±0.81分）。男生攻击行为显著高于女生（71.87±18.03 vs 76.20±17.64，P=0.003），7年级学生得分高于8年级学生（75.67±17.98 vs 72.84±17.83，P=0.054）。结论：初中生攻击行为受性别、年级等因素显著影响，建议从家庭教养、学校教育和社会支持三个层面构建综合干预体系，以促进青少年心理健康发展。
[1]Buss, Arnold H. “The psychology of aggression.” (1962): 180-181.
[2]Krahé, Barbara. The social psychology of aggression. Routledge, 2020.
[3]DeWall, C. Nathan, Craig A. Anderson, and Brad J. Bushman. “The general aggression model: Theoretical extensions to violence.” Psychology of violence 1.3 (2011):
245.
[4]张文新.欺凌的界定：文化和发展的视角[J].心理发展与教育,2023,39(04):590-598.
[5]Steinberg L D. Age of opportunity: Lessons from the new science of adolescence[M]. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2014.
[6]Buss A H, Perry M. The aggression questionnaire[J]. Journal of personality and social psychology, 1992, 63(3): 452.
[7]Archer J. Testosterone and human aggression: an evaluation of the challenge hypothesis[J]. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 2006, 30(3): 319-345.
[8]Bushman B J, Anderson C A. Is it time to pull the plug on hostile versus instrumental aggression dichotomy?[J]. Psychological review, 2001, 108(1): 273.
[9]Cooley, Morgan E., et al. “Parent–child interaction therapy: A meta-analysis of child behavior outcomes and parent stress.” Journal of family social work 17.3 (2014):
191-208.
[10]Durlak, Joseph A., et al. “The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta‐analysis of school‐based universal interventions.” Child devel
opment 82.1 (2011): 405-432.